‘Feasible, cost-effective’ to replace 2,300MW of Long Island peakers with energy
Published: 3 Nov 2020, 09:20
It would be “feasible and cost-effective” to retire more than a gigawatt (GW) of gas and fuel oil peaker plant capacity on New York’s densely populated Long Island within three years, according to a new study.
Long Island is home to 4,357MW of peaker plants, which operate at an annual capacity of just 15% or less, but cost the customers of Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) nearly half a billion dollars a year in maintenance costs.
The new study by Strategen Consulting finds that over a quarter of that capacity, 1,116MW, could be replaced by 2023 using energy storage and a further 1,209MW by 2030, as New York scales up its deployments of solar, offshore wind and energy efficiency measures to meet the state’s target of carbon-free energy by 2040.
Not only is that a feasible aim, Strategen said, but the deployment of energy storage as peaker replacement could save LIPA customers nearly US$400 million, while helping put the island on track to meet those state-wide goals, which are part of New York’s Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA).
The New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium (NY-BEST), a coalition pitched somewhere between a trade association and a technology acceleration support agency, commissioned Strategen Consulting to figure out a plan through which expensive and polluting peaking capacity in Long Island could be retired and replaced with low carbon technologies.
The amount currently paid in maintenance costs equates to nearly three times the rate for peaking capacity in New York’s Independent System Operator (NYISO)-run markets, while Long Island is already one of the areas of the US subjected to extreme weather events including hurricanes known to be exacerbated in intensity and frequency by climate change.
Huge economic and health benefits to replacing peakers with energy storage
According to Strategen, this peaker replacement plan using energy storage is a “low-hanging fruit” in the island’s energy transition. As their name suggests, peaker plants only come into action when demand for electricity on the grid is at its highest, but the facilities can be among the most polluting resources on the network. Many in the energy storage and renewable energy industries have highlighted that batteries and other storage can perform this role just as well, without the pollution and the costs of fuel and maintenance. Long Island is also where several gigawatts of planned offshore wind power plants in New York will interconnect to the state’s grid, offering an opportunity to contribute to charging the batteries with renewable energy at low marginal cost.
“The analysis shows that replacing the aged, polluting peaker fleet will reduce energy costs, create jobs, build a more resilient power system, reduce air pollution in Potential Environmental Justice Areas and lower greenhouse gas emissions – a ‘no regrets’ solution for all Long Islanders,” the study said.
The 2,300MW of LIPA’s peaker fleet considered by the Strategen study emit 2.65 million tonnes of carbon dioxide each year, nearly 2,000 tonnes of nitrogen oxides and 639 tonnes of sulphur dioxide, causing pollution which the consultancy estimates incurs a societal cost of more than US$160 million each year.
Deaths, hospital admissions and emergency department visits would be reduced by cleaning up the utility’s peaking capacity fleet and as alluded to the in the quote above, a disproportionate amount of that capacity is currently hosted in regions of low-income or minority populations, designated as Potential Environmental Justice Areas.
As LIPA long-term contracts with peaker plant operators are yet to expire…